servebolt
Awario
Internet

Top 7 most hated versions of Windows

In its 36-year history, Windows has had many popular versions such as Win 3.1 (1992) with the push to revolutionize the user interface on PC. We have Win 95, the first Windows with built-in Internet browser functionality, with the ability to run 32-bit applications, the iconic Start Menu button that remains to this day. We have Win XP (2001), the first truly user-oriented multitasking operating system, with the oldest of the versions.

Microsoft has also released bombs. Some early versions. Some because the technology is not mature enough, improved through updates. Some are simply… bad.

Here is a list of 7 Windows disasters in chronological order.

Windows 1.0

Released: November 1985

Microsoft has had some experience with graphical user-interfaces (GUIs) since it had worked with Apple to develop apps for the Mac the previous year. The company developed its own GUI on the DOS platform. It’s a graphical and multitasking sandbox application that can run DOS applications and applications programmed specifically for Windows.

Initially the media hated the product because of performance issues and lack of documentation for new users. In addition, most computers of the time could not run it because the hardware was not powerful enough. But anyway, this is only the first version of Microsoft.

Windows/386 2.10

Top 7 most hated versions of Windows | Internet

Released: May 1988

Windows 2.1 came out in two variants, one for the 16-bit Intel 80286 processor and the other for the 32-bit Intel 80386. The 386 variant allows running in protected mode, allowing applications and GUIs to run on functionality that emulates the 2086 microprocessor’s instruction set architecture. This enables selective multitasking – a Great achievement for PC operating systems. MS-DOS only allowed 1 application to run at a time, while Win 386 allowed DOS applications to run in the background, although applications that needed to access real-time information still had problems.

However, Win 386 runs unstable. An example is a memory manager that is not compatible with DOS’s manager. That means that some applications want to run, they have to boot from the floppy disk and then reboot into DOS. It’s hard to understand why Microsoft let users go through such hardships, yet people still have to bite their teeth to do it. Many more bugs were improved in Windows 3.0 released in 1990.

Windows NT 3.1

Released: July 1993

Top 7 most hated versions of Windows | Internet

Although this release was the foundation for the kernel that all modern versions use, Win NT 3.1 got off to a rough start. Initially, Windows NT 3.1 was just a remake of the OS/2 3.0 operating system that Microsoft and IBM jointly developed. When everyone went their separate ways, Microsoft decided to create Windows NT with its own vision and hired Dave Cutler from DEC, the architect that created the VMS operating system, as a key position on the development team. While OS/2 3.0 has the same user interface as Windows 3.1, the two operating systems have major architectural differences.

Windows NT has built-in protection, multi-core processor compatibility, multi-tasking, multi-user capabilities, regardless of processor architecture. However, it only runs Win32 applications programmed specifically for Windows. Earlier 16-bit applications could not run, or ran slowly, and backward compatibility with DOS was very poor. In addition, this version was also very expensive (workstation price was $500), with very high hardware requirements compared to the market at the time (minimum 386 processor with 12MB of memory), and ran best on non-Intel systems such as DEC Alpha and MIPS.

Windows Me

Released: September 2000

Top 7 most hated versions of Windows | Internet

Windows Millenium Edition, or ME, debuted as a revamp of Windows 98 (again a revamp of Win 95), before transitioning to the NT platform with Windows XP.

Windows ME comes with updated Internet Explorer and Windows Media player, which Win 98 and 95 users can install as an add-on package. Good idea, who knows that Windows ME is buggy, lacks support for legacy applications in real-mode like the previous version, is not optimized for modern PC hardware like Windows 2000, the business version is released. eyes at the same time.

It was not until a year later that Windows XP with the NT platform was released and became the most successful version in history.

Windows Vista

Released: January 2007

Top 7 most hated versions of Windows | Internet

Try mentioning Windows Vista when chatting with IT people, everyone will laugh. Windows Vista is bad in that it requires high hardware, cumbersome licensing conditions, slow startup, software compatibility errors, annoying DRM technology applications as well as constant permission requests from User Account Control that make angry users.

Despite much derision, many architectural changes to the end Windows Vista is still preserved today on Windows 7, which is also the most successful version – and a neatly rewritten version of Vista. .

Windows 8

Released: August 2012

Top 7 most hated versions of Windows | Internet

While the basic operating system is not much different from Windows 7, it is the new blocky interface called “Metro” with Live Tiles and the removal of the Start menu that is why Windows 8 became a disaster.

Microsoft tries to unify the Windows 8 interface across PCs and tablets, and even Windows Phone, but it doesn’t work. Live Tiles are still on Windows 10, but are less annoying and are being phased out in Windows 11.

Windows 11

Release: Fall 2021

Top 7 most hated versions of Windows | Internet

It’s too early to say whether Windows 11 will be hated, in part because it’s still unreleased. But many were disappointed to learn about the hardware requirements including the Trusted Platform 2.0 module (TPM 2.0) and at least 8th Gen Intel x86 systems and on. Many PCs will be left behind.

Ready or not, Windows 11 will leave millions of systems running Windows 10 abandoned after January 2025 when Microsoft will no longer support updates. The requirements are too high while the update has no major changes than the interface that will probably turn many Microsoft fans away.

According to ZDnet

Content Protection by DMCA.com
Back to top button