servebolt
Awario
Mobile

Let’s take a look at the most absurd incidents of the tech giants

Let s take a look at the most absurd incidents of the tech giants | Mobile

First of all, it is necessary to reiterate something few people realize: Apple really did a good idea to reduce iPhone performance! The older iPhones are, the more prone to bottle the battery, and reducing the clock speed helps increase battery life while avoiding crashes during use.

But Apple could have provided OPTION for users to turn the feature on or off. Apple could have announced this performance drop more clearly on the iOS 12 screen, or through the description of the update. But Apple does NOT do both, and good intentions become a scandal that is perhaps the most infamous in the history of the Apple family.

To appease the community, Tim Cook’s company had to open a $ 30 battery replacement program for users in many countries. However, the US court still forced Apple to make a $ 500 million settlement. Even though it’s just a “broken salt” compared to the huge profits of the Apple family, it is clear that Apple was able to avoid all of these losses with a single line of clear notice when updating.

Let s take a look at the most absurd incidents of the tech giants | Mobile

Let s take a look at the most absurd incidents of the tech giants | Mobile

Mentioning the Galaxy Note is referring to the pioneering phone for the big screen movement. But if you only have a 5.5-inch screen or more, that’s not enough: what makes the Note experience really appealing are the pens that are equipped with many features, helping to make the most of the display area to do things. service useful for work.

In 2014, this pen suddenly gave Samsung a headache. Just a few weeks after the product was on the shelves, some users and many technology news sites complained that the Note 5’s pen would be stuck in the body if inserted in the wrong direction. The Internet community is divided into two fiercely controversial halves. One side is that Samsung has made a fundamental design mistake. The other half believes that the fault of the user is when not used carefully.

Each side has their own reasons, but it is worth mentioning that all 4 previous Note generations did NOT encounter this situation. All previous generations of S Pen pens had a larger rear pen tip and therefore wouldn’t be able to be inserted back into the pen slot.

Let s take a look at the most absurd incidents of the tech giants | Mobile

After making a clear announcement, and after correcting the manual, Samsung finally got the wrong part. All Note5 models shipped later, and all the Note generations later used the S Pen with a thicker back than the previous. Plugging the pen upside down becomes the story of a distant past.

Let s take a look at the most absurd incidents of the tech giants | Mobile

At the present time, water resistance is no longer a strength of any smartphone brand as all high-end smartphones have IP certification. But in 2012, waterproof (and dust) was only Sony’s strength.

The problem is that the Xperia Z, although waterproof according to IP standards, cannot … completely waterproof. For example, the IP68 standard only guarantees the device can “survive” for 30 minutes at a depth of 1.5 meters in a laboratory. When promoting the product, Sony has released countless pictures of users using Xperia under the swimming pool to take pictures.

Let s take a look at the most absurd incidents of the tech giants | Mobile

As a result, countless Xperia phones get damaged when water enters. Water drops overflow when the Japanese smartphone company refuses to warranty for all these products, including those still in the period. Lawsuits started to break out, Sony’s marketing materials were changed to say Sony phones … were not waterproof, and by 2016 the Japanese company had to accept 50% compensation for the price of damaged Xperia phones. Damaged by water.

The damages caused by this lawsuit may be part of the reason why Sony gradually “evaporated” from the smartphone market. Sony and other manufacturers have to learn a simple, but expensive lesson: don’t use pool or beach images to promote smartphones. Samsung alone is breaking the rule, and not surprisingly, in 2019 the Korean manufacturer was also brought to court by the Competition and Consumer Protection Commission in Australia due to photos of Galaxy smartphones in swimming pools and Beach.

Let s take a look at the most absurd incidents of the tech giants | Mobile

Long before Apple switched Macs to ARM, Microsoft saw the potential of chips that were meant for mobile phones instead of Windows. In 2012, alongside Windows 8, the software giant released its own version of Windows running on ARM called “Windows RT”. A Windows RT logo tablet called Surface RT was also released, alongside the Surface Pro running Windows 8 (running on Intel / ARM x86).

Unfortunately, ARM is very different from x86, and Windows RT cannot run exe applications familiar to Windows users either. Things are even more confusing when Microsoft uses the full Windows interface for Windows RT: the average user has no way to distinguish between these two extremely different versions.

Let s take a look at the most absurd incidents of the tech giants | Mobile

As a result, after the first generation, “low sales” and “high rate of return” led Microsoft to record a loss of $ 900 million for the Surface RT. Persistent, Microsoft continued to launch the Surface 2 and continued to suffer losses until the end of the line in 2015.

At the same time, Google’s ChromeBooks were growing rapidly again: in 2013, nearly 2 million ChromeBooks were sold in the US. Obviously, the demand for low-powered and browser-centered laptops is real! Microsoft could have enjoyed the full success of ChromeBook – if Windows RT was to wear its own coat, marketed as a completely different operating system, not the “shadow” of Windows 8.

Let s take a look at the most absurd incidents of the tech giants | Mobile

When expanding globally, Chinese phone companies have encountered many scandalous problems. For example, OnePlus has been criticized for its program “smashing rival phones”, Huawei has been controversial around AI-optimized moon pictures by … “collage”, and OPPO has had trouble when Its employees misconduct against the Indian flag.

Let s take a look at the most absurd incidents of the tech giants | Mobile

But certainly no communication flaws as dumb as Xiaomi. In 2019, the Chinese phone company opened “flash sale” for Mi 8 Lite and Mi A2 for just over £ 1. Mi fans in the UK have not had time to celebrate, they have to fall back: exactly 1 day before the sale, Xiaomi changed the promotion terms and only “flash sale” exactly 10 units. The announcement of Little Rice seemed to anger fans even more: We did not know that the public tied the phrase “Flash Sale” to a deal model that Xiaomi had run globally, with a scale of more than 10. product.

Yet, a Twitter user while monitoring the javascript code on the Xiaomi website also discovered that, when the user pressed buy, Xiaomi did not even check the quantity of the sale, but only set the time and automatically showed “expired. row”. Xiaomi’s product manager says that there are thousands of buyers at the same time, and Xiaomi will randomly select the winner.

Ironically, this explanation is in stark contrast to the term previously announced by Xiaomi itself – whoever clicks to buy first gets priority. After this catastrophic flash sale, Xiaomi was investigated by the British advertising agency (ASA) and then ordered to be “clearer” in its marketing campaigns.

Content Protection by DMCA.com
Back to top button